General discussion for aviators

Archive for October, 2010

OT: AOL Starts to Charge for Receiving eMail (spread the word)

sorry for OT, but I see some here with AOL addresses, and it might be of
similar interest like the usenet feed problem in the other thread.

[via NANOG]

(@ –> " AT " for spam prevention)

—snip
Begin forwarded message:

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne AT warpspeed.com>
Date: May 10, 2006 6:59:52 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net AT warpspeed.com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] AOL Starts to Charge for Receiving eMail, DearAOL
responds
Reply-To: dewayne AT warpspeed.com

[Note:  Posted on the behalf of EFF.  DLH]

DearAOL.com Coalition members,

Well, it happened. Without informing either their users or senders, AOL
last Friday turned on their Certified Mail system, and began to accept
payment for delivering incoming mail.

While we’re disappointed in AOL’s action, we’re not surprised – nor are
we discouraged. What is important is that the temptation to take money
to skip spam filters does not spread throughout the industry.

That’s why we’re asking other ISPs and webmail providers to state that
they will not accept money for email.

Can you help us? I’ve enclosed a letter you can send to your own ISP or
web mail provider, asking them to state that they will not follow AOL’s
lead. The language we ask them to agree to is taken from a statement by
representatives of Google’s Gmail service, who told reporters last month
that "[Gmail] does not accept payment to bypass its filters", and does
not plan to charge senders.

Customize it as you wish, and send it, ideally to their executives in
charge of email delivery or higher: you may have to contact customer
support to find the right person.

Obviously, if you’re an AOL customer, you may have a little trouble
persuading your current ISP to agree! But if you use another web mail
provider as well as AOL, or are considering switching to a competitor,
perhaps you can send the same message to their staff instead.

Thanks again for taking part in this effort. We really think AOL is
shooting themselves in the foot by taking this money – and we’re sure
there are other companies who may be happy to learn from their mistakes.

Best wishes,

Danny O’Brien,
Activism Co-ordinator,
Electronic Frontier Foundation
+1 415 436 9333 x121

============8><==== CUT HERE, AND SEND TO YOUR ISP =====8><==========
As you may have seen in the press, many groups, including my own, have
expressed concern with plans by AOL and Yahoo to charge payment from
third-party senders to reach their customers’ inboxes. I’m writing in
the hope that you will be one of our list of ISPs and mailbox providers
who publicly commit not to follow the same path – and who we highlight
to consumers and the media as one of the good actors in the industry.

We’ve asked AOL to re-consider their plans at http://www.dearaol.com/ .
That open letter has been joined by six hundred organizations,
representing over 15 million members, including individuals like Craig
Newmark from Craig’s List and organizations like the Service Roundtable,
CSPR, the AFL-CIO, Gun Owners of America, MoveOn.org, EFF, and Oxfam
America. Members of the coalition have gathered over 350,000 signatories
in support.

As part of this campaign, we’re collecting names of ISPs and mailbox
providers who are committed to delivering their customers’ email without
charging the sender. We’ll be publicizing these ISPs to coalition
members and to the press as companies that do the right thing.

To that end, would your company consider agreeing to the language below?

     "We will not accept payment to bypass our anti-spam filters, nor
     charge senders to reach our users."

Note that this wording neither excludes the possibility of adopting
certification or authentication systems (all of the current
certification systems such as Bonded Sender and Habeas would be
acceptable, as would Goodmail under a different contractual arrangement
than the current agreement with AOL).

We’ve already had sign-on on these principles from Google’s GMail, and
we’d be delighted to include you in the growing list of companies we’ll
be publicizing.

Let me know if you’d be interested in signing on. If you have any
questions,
you can contact the organizer of this campaign, Danny O’Brien, at
danny AT eff.org, or call him on +1 408 480 3412.

PS – Here’s an editorial and a couple of articles that have been written
about this issue so far:

Google will not follow AOL so no payment system planned for Gmail
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/
wpn-60-20060420NoGoodmailForGmail.html

Paid e-mail will lead to separate, unequal systems
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/14023726.htm

Diverse Groups Team Up to Fight E-Mail Fee (AP)
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/print?id=1668695

Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
============8><==== CUT HERE, AND SEND TO YOUR ISP =====8><==========

—snap

#m


"We’re out of toilet paper sir!"
<http://www.webcrunchers.com/crunch/Play/history/stories/toilet.html>

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (7)

Sky Diving Accident

Talking about a bad landing. This must have hurt beyond believe. Check
it out:
http://www.jumpingpixels.com/parachute.html

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Learning from an owner annual

After 6 years of Mooney ownership I’m doing my first owner assisted
annual. Most of my previous annuals have been done by factory service
centers. I’m quite a good wrench around cars so this experience is
mostly about me learning the standards & practices of aircraft work.
I’m amazed by a couple things…
1) The number of things I found that were not done that I’d paid to
have done at previous annuals.
2) The number of things done wrong (like no cotter key in the wheel).
3) The amount of work an annual really requires. It took me 6 hours
just to remove all the inspection panels (including drilling out
several dozen screws). Lubing the 150 lube points wont go too quick
either.

Its also interesting to me how many things are safety wired while other
things (that seem more important) are not. Brake calapers are safety
wired but fuel lines are not, etc. Its quite depressing to see my plane
in so many pieces. I’ve also discovered that its extreamly irritating
that the aircraft parts places are closed on weekends.

I would highly recommend this experience to any aircraft owner who is
comfortable with a wrench.

-Robert

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

Re: Using outdated maps / AFDs

"Walter Smith" <nos…@nospam.nospam> wrote in message

news:Rwy9g.1012$cl5.915@trndny07…

> On 2006-05-14, Tony Goetz <t…@togo84.com> wrote:

>> http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/chart_bulletins

>> Also from the FAA, on average you can expect 100 changes to each
>> TAC, 278 changes to each sectional, and 775 changes to each AFD
>> (source: http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/faq ). Oh
>> well.

> That average stated in the faq does not seem to be consistent with the
> chart bulletins.  I looked at the chart bulletin for the New York VFR
> sectional, and the last change was last November.  Zero is much less
> than 278.  So does that mean there were no changes from the previous
> revision and the current one, or are the chart bulletins incomplete?

The latter, I think. For example, over the past several years, I’ve noticed
and reported more than a dozen instances in which airports in the NY
Sectional were displaced by up to a mile or so from their actual locations
(in some cases, they were moved to the wrong side of a river or highway,
which makes it particularly confusing to use the chart to find a given
airport for the first time). The errors were always fixed in the next
edition, but I’ve never seen such repositionings mentioned in the chart
bulletins.

–Gary

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

NJ Abandoned airport? Can you ID?

I was stuck in a holding pattern over southern New Jersey while PHL was
nearly shutdown due to weather.  During the numerous circuits I noticed
what looks to be an abandoned airport north of Millville.  I found it on
Google Earth but didn’t see any reference to it on Paul Freeman’s
excellent abandoned airport page:
[http://www.airfields-freeman.com/NJ/Airfields_NJ.htm]

Can anyone identify this one?  I’m not sure it was an airport but it
sure looks like it had two or maybe even three runways.
Location is near Pittsgrove and Newfield in Southern New Jersey.  It is
between Willow Grove Lake and state highway 55.

It’s in the middle of this image:
http://tinyurl.com/qcdx7  [google maps]
39.55 N   75.06 W

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (11)

BFR yesterday; first instrument approaches!

My BFR was due in June, so I figured I’d get it out of the way a little
early so I wouldn’t have to possibly ground myself. I scheduled for
Saturday, but the weather was looking marginal (I’m VFR only). Saturday
morning rolled around, TAF called for IMC. So I called my instructor to get
his thoughts. He asked me if I was instrument rated (no), I asked him if it
was possible to incorporate some simulated IFR into the flight portion of
the review. That’s what we did.
After some ground discussion and Q&A, we filed IFR from OSU (Ohio state
University, Columbus OH), to CYO (Circleville OH), to TZR (Bolton) and back
to OSU. Prior to this, the only instrument training I had was the hood time
for the private, and an hour here and there for aircraft checkouts, unusual
attitude etc. I have to tell you, I am quite excited about persuing my
instrument rating now. It is one thing to read about it or watch a video on
the topic, quite another to actually do it. Being vectored around for
traffic, given clearance for the approach, etc. was a great experience and
lots of fun. Wirh the weather as it is right now in Ohio, at 4000 feet it
was absolutely the smoothest ride I can remember.
So, I got to do some IFR approaches, Bill (the instructor) got to evaluate
my flying skills and I got myself current for another 2 years. Worked out
well.

Mike

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (4)

[Colorado]Sharing the Skies with Sailplanes

http://www.faasafety.gov/SPANS/event_details.aspx?eid=10731

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (3)

A WHAT Ran off the End of our Runway??

So our ILS is out at Republic Airport for the foreseeable future. A
"single-engine Marine jet" was the culprit according to the early stories in
the paper. I drove by the airport to survey the damage and was quite
surprised to see a *Harrier* jet sitting there! Umm, can’t these things land
literally on a dime?? This was at the end of a 7,000 ft. runway. There’s
probably a new callsign in the future for that Marine pilot…

Marco

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
———————————————————-
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
———————————————————-        
                http://www.usenet.com

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (9)

Question for controllers

In your controller training, are situations addressed concerning aircraft
which request priority but do not declare an emergency? Is there any
guidance in the Controllers’ Handbook?

D.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (22)

Teach W to fly

All:

A simple flash game:

http://www.zeljo.com/teach-W-to-fly

================================

This page is random and kind of off topic but if I recall correctly W
was a pilot of some sort flying like 30 years ago. It appears that he
took his flying lessons in Cessna T-41A and the Jet Trainer Aircraft
Northrop T-38.

I am not sure what happened in the meantime, but it looks to me that he
might need some flight lessons here.

So, all you need to do is to click your mouse on W’s body and move the
mouse in any direction. Go ahead, do not hesitate to teach him to fly.

If you find this page fun, and please don’t forget to forward this
flying exercise to anyone who might enjoy it.

================================

V

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)