<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BFR.. define &quot;rated&quot;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8852</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8852</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;&gt; Ratings are the things that appear on your pilot certificate. &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Category, class, and for things that require it a type rating &lt;br /&gt; &gt; (jets and other large aircraft). &#160; Tailwheel, complex, or &lt;br /&gt; &gt; HP do not count. &#160;They aren&#039;t ratings. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;They are &quot;endorsements&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Ratings are the things that appear on your pilot certificate. <br /> &gt; Category, class, and for things that require it a type rating <br /> &gt; (jets and other large aircraft). &nbsp; Tailwheel, complex, or <br /> &gt; HP do not count. &nbsp;They aren&#8217;t ratings. </p>
<p>They are &quot;endorsements&quot;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8851</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8851</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;George Patterson wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &gt; You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that &lt;br /&gt; &gt; somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don&#039;t have the tailwheel &lt;br /&gt; &gt; signoff, the CFI has to have it. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Of course, if your BFR has expired, you can&#039;t be PIC during the review &lt;br /&gt; anyhow... &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Patterson wrote: <br /> &gt; You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that <br /> &gt; somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don&#8217;t have the tailwheel <br /> &gt; signoff, the CFI has to have it. </p>
<p>Of course, if your BFR has expired, you can&#8217;t be PIC during the review <br /> anyhow&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8849</guid>
		<description>
  Yes that will satisfy the BFR, but he has to get his plane to the Wings &lt;br /&gt; event. and you are assuming that there will be an instructor there that is &lt;br /&gt; both qualified and willing to do this. Maybe have a tailwheel endorsed pilot &lt;br /&gt; friend fly him there? I dunno, sounds like a whole lot of trouble just to &lt;br /&gt; save a couple of hours in the plane. Just get your BFR done in whatever you &lt;br /&gt; are currently qualified to fly, and get the tailwheel endorsement &lt;br /&gt; seperately. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&quot;RK Henry&quot; &lt;robert.he...@earthlink.net&gt; wrote in message &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;news:dq75j1ltike2558vsndi8baoaimfdp145o@4ax.com... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -&lt;/p&gt;&gt; On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S &lt;Dasta...@earthlink.net&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt; &gt;Pinging the group for an answer here. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; &gt;Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &gt;taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &gt;NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &gt;to be PIC. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings &lt;br /&gt; &gt; phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice &lt;br /&gt; &gt; certificate and pin and you don&#039;t have to bother with a flight review. &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Would that work? I think you&#039; re supposed to get a variety of &lt;br /&gt; &gt; instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I &lt;br /&gt; &gt; expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; RK Henry &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that will satisfy the BFR, but he has to get his plane to the Wings <br /> event. and you are assuming that there will be an instructor there that is <br /> both qualified and willing to do this. Maybe have a tailwheel endorsed pilot <br /> friend fly him there? I dunno, sounds like a whole lot of trouble just to <br /> save a couple of hours in the plane. Just get your BFR done in whatever you <br /> are currently qualified to fly, and get the tailwheel endorsement <br /> seperately. <br /> 
<p>&quot;RK Henry&quot; &lt;robert.he&#8230;@earthlink.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:dq75j1ltike2558vsndi8baoaimfdp145o@4ax.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -</p>
<p>&gt; On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S &lt;Dasta&#8230;@earthlink.net&gt; <br /> &gt; wrote: <br /> 
<p>&gt; &gt;Pinging the group for an answer here.  </p>
<p>&gt; &gt;Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a <br /> &gt; &gt;taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do <br /> &gt; &gt;NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one <br /> &gt; &gt;to be PIC.  </p>
<p>&gt; What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings <br /> &gt; phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice <br /> &gt; certificate and pin and you don&#8217;t have to bother with a flight review. <br /> &gt; Would that work? I think you&#8217; re supposed to get a variety of <br /> &gt; instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I <br /> &gt; expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them.  </p>
<p>&gt; RK Henry </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8850</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8850</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;Dave S wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one is &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &quot;rated&quot; for. Does rated apply to &quot;category and class&quot; or is there also &lt;br /&gt; &gt; the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well (when &lt;br /&gt; &gt; applicable)? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Ratings are the things that appear on your pilot certificate. &lt;br /&gt; Category, class, and for things that require it a type rating &lt;br /&gt; (jets and other large aircraft). &#160; Tailwheel, complex, or &lt;br /&gt; HP do not count. &#160;They aren&#039;t ratings. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave S wrote:  </p>
<p>&gt; The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one is <br /> &gt; &quot;rated&quot; for. Does rated apply to &quot;category and class&quot; or is there also <br /> &gt; the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well (when <br /> &gt; applicable)? </p>
<p>Ratings are the things that appear on your pilot certificate. <br /> Category, class, and for things that require it a type rating <br /> (jets and other large aircraft). &nbsp; Tailwheel, complex, or <br /> HP do not count. &nbsp;They aren&#8217;t ratings. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;&quot;Dave S&quot; &lt;Dasta...@earthlink.net&gt; wrote in message news:PlrYe.1719$oc.1323@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA&#039;s library specificly REQUIRES the CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when &lt;br /&gt; &gt; providing a flight review in a tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the &quot;authorized instructor&quot; clause, &lt;br /&gt; &gt; and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one must be endorsed, in their view). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Does it say they need the endorsement even if they are grandfathered in (pre what...&#039;93?)??? &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Dave S&quot; &lt;Dasta&#8230;@earthlink.net&gt; wrote in message news:PlrYe.1719$oc.1323@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net&#8230; <br /> &gt; Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA&#8217;s library specificly REQUIRES the CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when <br /> &gt; providing a flight review in a tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the &quot;authorized instructor&quot; clause, <br /> &gt; and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one must be endorsed, in their view). </p>
<p>Does it say they need the endorsement even if they are grandfathered in (pre what&#8230;&#8217;93?)??? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8846</guid>
		<description>
  On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S &lt;Dasta...@earthlink.net&gt; &lt;br /&gt; wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;Pinging the group for an answer here. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt;Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a &lt;br /&gt; &gt;taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do &lt;br /&gt; &gt;NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one &lt;br /&gt; &gt;to be PIC. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings &lt;br /&gt; phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice &lt;br /&gt; certificate and pin and you don&#039;t have to bother with a flight review. &lt;br /&gt; Would that work? I think you&#039; re supposed to get a variety of &lt;br /&gt; instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I &lt;br /&gt; expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RK Henry &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S &lt;Dasta&#8230;@earthlink.net&gt; <br /> wrote: <br /> 
<p>&gt;Pinging the group for an answer here.  </p>
<p>&gt;Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a <br /> &gt;taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do <br /> &gt;NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one <br /> &gt;to be PIC. </p>
<p>What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings <br /> phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice <br /> certificate and pin and you don&#8217;t have to bother with a flight review. <br /> Would that work? I think you&#8217; re supposed to get a variety of <br /> instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I <br /> expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them.  </p>
<p>RK Henry </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8847</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;&quot;Viperdoc&quot; &lt;jnin...@NOattglobalSPAMM.net&gt; wrote in message &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;news:AhmYe.51899$32.15866@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR &lt;br /&gt; &gt; in three different planes? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;No and for that matter, and I think this is insane, when I got my R-H &lt;br /&gt; certificate that acted as my BFR for ASEL which at the time I hadn&#039;t been in &lt;br /&gt; the cockpit of one for 5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Viperdoc&quot; &lt;jnin&#8230;@NOattglobalSPAMM.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:AhmYe.51899$32.15866@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>&gt; So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR <br /> &gt; in three different planes? </p>
<p>No and for that matter, and I think this is insane, when I got my R-H <br /> certificate that acted as my BFR for ASEL which at the time I hadn&#8217;t been in <br /> the cockpit of one for 5 years. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8844</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8844</guid>
		<description>
  You do not need a tailwheel signoff for FAA purposes. You are already &lt;br /&gt; rated in catagory and class for single engine land then you are &quot;rated&quot; &lt;br /&gt; in a tailwheel, because tailwheel is just a logbook endorsement. &lt;br /&gt; However, if the training does not end in a tailwheel endorsement, then &lt;br /&gt; I think an instructor would have a problem signing off on your flight &lt;br /&gt; review. Part of a flight review is to be able to land and take off &lt;br /&gt; safely. I wouldn&#039;t sign off a flight review if the training was in a &lt;br /&gt; taildragger unless the pilot had a taildragger endorsement. The &lt;br /&gt; tailwheel training to get a tailwheel signoff could be used for the 1 &lt;br /&gt; hour requirement of flight training required for a flight review. You &lt;br /&gt; wouldn&#039;t need an additional hour of &quot;flight review training&quot;. At least &lt;br /&gt; not if you trained with me. Taildragger endorsements take all sorts of &lt;br /&gt; different number of hours. The difficulty is crosswind landings. You &lt;br /&gt; need the wind, and you need to demostrate you can land in it. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;So strickly speaking, for satisfying FAA requirements, yes, you can do &lt;br /&gt; your flight review training in a taildragger if you don&#039;t have a &lt;br /&gt; tailwheel signoff. But practical matters dictate that you are going to &lt;br /&gt; need it. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do not need a tailwheel signoff for FAA purposes. You are already <br /> rated in catagory and class for single engine land then you are &quot;rated&quot; <br /> in a tailwheel, because tailwheel is just a logbook endorsement. <br /> However, if the training does not end in a tailwheel endorsement, then <br /> I think an instructor would have a problem signing off on your flight <br /> review. Part of a flight review is to be able to land and take off <br /> safely. I wouldn&#8217;t sign off a flight review if the training was in a <br /> taildragger unless the pilot had a taildragger endorsement. The <br /> tailwheel training to get a tailwheel signoff could be used for the 1 <br /> hour requirement of flight training required for a flight review. You <br /> wouldn&#8217;t need an additional hour of &quot;flight review training&quot;. At least <br /> not if you trained with me. Taildragger endorsements take all sorts of <br /> different number of hours. The difficulty is crosswind landings. You <br /> need the wind, and you need to demostrate you can land in it. <br /> 
<p>So strickly speaking, for satisfying FAA requirements, yes, you can do <br /> your flight review training in a taildragger if you don&#8217;t have a <br /> tailwheel signoff. But practical matters dictate that you are going to <br /> need it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8845</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8845</guid>
		<description>
  Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA&#039;s library specificly REQUIRES the &lt;br /&gt; CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when providing a flight review in a &lt;br /&gt; tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the &quot;authorized &lt;br /&gt; instructor&quot; clause, and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one &lt;br /&gt; must be endorsed, in their view). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;Granted, the FAQ&#039;s are pretty far down the list in the scheme of things &lt;br /&gt; with regards to the regulatory heirarchy, but it&#039;s the &quot;party line&quot;. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, in my situation, I did about 8 hours total in the tailwheel, &lt;br /&gt; to the point I could manage wheel landings, 3 pointers and xwinds with &lt;br /&gt; both. This was over 2 days, and combined with some spectacular mountain &lt;br /&gt; area flying in the Salt Lake area. My friend/instructor was not sure if &lt;br /&gt; a BFR in a plane I was not endorsed in would pass the &quot;smell test&quot; if it &lt;br /&gt; were ever auditied, so we hammered things out to the point he felt I was &lt;br /&gt; endorseable for PIC tailwheel. Combined with about 3-4 hours of &lt;br /&gt; tailwheel dabbling over the past 4-5 years, I made the transition fairly &lt;br /&gt; well, given that the 180 was characterized as a little more difficult &lt;br /&gt; than an ordinary entry level tailwheel. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the replies and opinions with regards to the ratings issue, &lt;br /&gt; even though at this point it&#039;s purely an academic exercise with regard &lt;br /&gt; to me. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -&lt;/p&gt;George Patterson wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &gt; Dave S wrote: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt; The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one &lt;br /&gt; &gt;&gt; is &quot;rated&quot; for. Does rated apply to &quot;category and class&quot; or is there &lt;br /&gt; &gt;&gt; also the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well &lt;br /&gt; &gt;&gt; (when applicable)? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that &lt;br /&gt; &gt; somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don&#039;t have the tailwheel &lt;br /&gt; &gt; signoff, the CFI has to have it. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; George Patterson &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &#160; &#160; &#160;Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to &lt;br /&gt; &gt; &#160; &#160; &#160;use the Internet and he won&#039;t bother you for weeks. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA&#8217;s library specificly REQUIRES the <br /> CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when providing a flight review in a <br /> tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the &quot;authorized <br /> instructor&quot; clause, and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one <br /> must be endorsed, in their view). <br /> 
<p>Granted, the FAQ&#8217;s are pretty far down the list in the scheme of things <br /> with regards to the regulatory heirarchy, but it&#8217;s the &quot;party line&quot;.  </p>
<p>By the way, in my situation, I did about 8 hours total in the tailwheel, <br /> to the point I could manage wheel landings, 3 pointers and xwinds with <br /> both. This was over 2 days, and combined with some spectacular mountain <br /> area flying in the Salt Lake area. My friend/instructor was not sure if <br /> a BFR in a plane I was not endorsed in would pass the &quot;smell test&quot; if it <br /> were ever auditied, so we hammered things out to the point he felt I was <br /> endorseable for PIC tailwheel. Combined with about 3-4 hours of <br /> tailwheel dabbling over the past 4-5 years, I made the transition fairly <br /> well, given that the 180 was characterized as a little more difficult <br /> than an ordinary entry level tailwheel.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the replies and opinions with regards to the ratings issue, <br /> even though at this point it&#8217;s purely an academic exercise with regard <br /> to me.  </p>
<p>Dave  </p>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -</p>
<p>George Patterson wrote: <br /> &gt; Dave S wrote: <br /> 
<p>&gt;&gt; The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one <br /> &gt;&gt; is &quot;rated&quot; for. Does rated apply to &quot;category and class&quot; or is there <br /> &gt;&gt; also the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well <br /> &gt;&gt; (when applicable)?  </p>
<p>&gt; You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that <br /> &gt; somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don&#8217;t have the tailwheel <br /> &gt; signoff, the CFI has to have it.  </p>
<p>&gt; George Patterson <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to <br /> &gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;use the Internet and he won&#8217;t bother you for weeks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated/comment-page-1#comment-8842</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/bfr-define-rated#comment-8842</guid>
		<description>
  No &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&quot;Viperdoc&quot; &lt;jnin...@NOattglobalSPAMM.net&gt; wrote in message &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;news:AhmYe.51899$32.15866@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -&lt;/p&gt;&gt; So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR &lt;br /&gt; &gt; in three different planes? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No <br /> 
<p>&quot;Viperdoc&quot; &lt;jnin&#8230;@NOattglobalSPAMM.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:AhmYe.51899$32.15866@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com&#8230;  </p>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -</p>
<p>&gt; So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR <br /> &gt; in three different planes? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

