With everything that I have heard about Belfort, I would think people
should wonder who owns this company. Personally, I thought it was
SCROOGE. A search at http://www.nasdaq.com
revealed "No matches found" for Belfort Instrument Inc. So the company
must be privately-held.
A search at
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Belfort+Instrument+Inc+owner…
revealed:
Reissue Applications Notice – OG Date: 26 February 200226, 2001, Cl.
340/601,
PORTABLE METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM, Bruce R. Robinson, Owner of
Record: Belfort Instrument, Inc., Baltimore, MD, …
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2002/week09/patreis.htm
Then, a search at
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Bruce+R.+Robinson&btnG=Search
showed
UtiliPoint International, Inc.
Bruce R. Robinson Chairman. Mr. Robinson is the senior corporate
officer
Responsible for strategic planning … Bruce R. Robinson. Contact Bruce
Robinson …
www.utilipoint.com/team/robinson.asp with a link to
http://www.quickstrategy.com
Strategy Advisors (http://www.quickstrategy.com/advisors.jsp)
include: Mr. Robinson who has authored "Strategic Acquisitions: A Guide
to Growing and Enhancing the Value of Your Business, and QuickStrategy:
A Proven Method to Focus and Guide Your Business in Rapidly Changing
Markets."
It makes one wonder if he reads his own books! If he had, he’d know
that Belfort Instruments is in the fast lane to nowhere!
Uncle Scrooges are everywhere, huh!
Yeah, scrooges everywhere! Thanks for the information! I checked your
sources and they were, indeed correct!
And, they wonder why individuals talk about them!
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
sinkingcomp…@titanic.net wrote:
> With everything that I have heard about Belfort, I would think people
> should wonder who owns this company. Personally, I thought it was
> SCROOGE. A search at http://www.nasdaq.com
> revealed "No matches found" for Belfort Instrument Inc. So the company
> must be privately-held.
> A search at
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Belfort+Instrument+Inc+owner…
> revealed:
> Reissue Applications Notice – OG Date: 26 February 200226, 2001, Cl.
> 340/601,
> PORTABLE METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM, Bruce R. Robinson, Owner of
> Record: Belfort Instrument, Inc., Baltimore, MD, …
> http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2002/week09/patreis.htm
> Then, a search at
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Bruce+R.+Robinson&btnG=Search
> showed
> UtiliPoint International, Inc.
> Bruce R. Robinson Chairman. Mr. Robinson is the senior corporate
> officer
> Responsible for strategic planning … Bruce R. Robinson. Contact Bruce
> Robinson …
> http://www.utilipoint.com/team/robinson.asp with a link to
> http://www.quickstrategy.com
> Strategy Advisors (http://www.quickstrategy.com/advisors.jsp)
> include: Mr. Robinson who has authored "Strategic Acquisitions: A Guide
> to Growing and Enhancing the Value of Your Business, and QuickStrategy:
> A Proven Method to Focus and Guide Your Business in Rapidly Changing
> Markets."
> It makes one wonder if he reads his own books! If he had, he’d know
> that Belfort Instruments is in the fast lane to nowhere!
> Uncle Scrooges are everywhere, huh!
I think that’s Individual. It only appears to be you.
Did you get sacked by them. In all honesty, sounds like they had grounds
to
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
deckerpec…@merseymail.com wrote:
> Yeah, scrooges everywhere! Thanks for the information! I checked your
> sources and they were, indeed correct!
> And, they wonder why individuals talk about them!
> sinkingcomp…@titanic.net wrote:
>>With everything that I have heard about Belfort, I would think people
>>should wonder who owns this company. Personally, I thought it was
>>SCROOGE. A search at http://www.nasdaq.com
>>revealed "No matches found" for Belfort Instrument Inc. So the company
>>must be privately-held.
>>A search at
>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Belfort+Instrument+Inc+owner…
>>revealed:
>>Reissue Applications Notice – OG Date: 26 February 200226, 2001, Cl.
>>340/601,
>>PORTABLE METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM, Bruce R. Robinson, Owner of
>>Record: Belfort Instrument, Inc., Baltimore, MD, …
>>http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2002/week09/patreis.htm
>>Then, a search at
>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Bruce+R.+Robinson&btnG=Search
>>showed
>>UtiliPoint International, Inc.
>>Bruce R. Robinson Chairman. Mr. Robinson is the senior corporate
>>officer
>>Responsible for strategic planning … Bruce R. Robinson. Contact Bruce
>>Robinson …
>>www.utilipoint.com/team/robinson.asp with a link to
>>http://www.quickstrategy.com
>>Strategy Advisors (http://www.quickstrategy.com/advisors.jsp)
>>include: Mr. Robinson who has authored "Strategic Acquisitions: A Guide
>>to Growing and Enhancing the Value of Your Business, and QuickStrategy:
>>A Proven Method to Focus and Guide Your Business in Rapidly Changing
>>Markets."
>>It makes one wonder if he reads his own books! If he had, he’d know
>>that Belfort Instruments is in the fast lane to nowhere!
>>Uncle Scrooges are everywhere, huh!
Ya, I’m wondering if he realizes the jail time per count of libel when/if
Belfort discovers this thread and then makes the easy trace of his now 14
different identifies back to his PC.
"Glenn" <this…@fakeaddress.com> wrote in message
news:43b62775@news.velocitynet.com.au…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
>I think that’s Individual. It only appears to be you.
> Did you get sacked by them. In all honesty, sounds like they had grounds
> to
> deckerpec…@merseymail.com wrote:
>> Yeah, scrooges everywhere! Thanks for the information! I checked your
>> sources and they were, indeed correct!
>> And, they wonder why individuals talk about them!
>> sinkingcomp…@titanic.net wrote:
>>>With everything that I have heard about Belfort, I would think people
>>>should wonder who owns this company. Personally, I thought it was
>>>SCROOGE. A search at http://www.nasdaq.com
>>>revealed "No matches found" for Belfort Instrument Inc. So the company
>>>must be privately-held.
>>>A search at
>>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Belfort+Instrument+Inc+owner…
>>>revealed:
>>>Reissue Applications Notice – OG Date: 26 February 200226, 2001, Cl.
>>>340/601,
>>>PORTABLE METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM, Bruce R. Robinson, Owner of
>>>Record: Belfort Instrument, Inc., Baltimore, MD, …
>>>http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2002/week09/patreis.htm
>>>Then, a search at
>>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Bruce+R.+Robinson&btnG=Search
>>>showed
>>>UtiliPoint International, Inc.
>>>Bruce R. Robinson Chairman. Mr. Robinson is the senior corporate
>>>officer
>>>Responsible for strategic planning … Bruce R. Robinson. Contact Bruce
>>>Robinson …
>>>www.utilipoint.com/team/robinson.asp with a link to
>>>http://www.quickstrategy.com
>>>Strategy Advisors (http://www.quickstrategy.com/advisors.jsp)
>>>include: Mr. Robinson who has authored "Strategic Acquisitions: A Guide
>>>to Growing and Enhancing the Value of Your Business, and QuickStrategy:
>>>A Proven Method to Focus and Guide Your Business in Rapidly Changing
>>>Markets."
>>>It makes one wonder if he reads his own books! If he had, he’d know
>>>that Belfort Instruments is in the fast lane to nowhere!
>>>Uncle Scrooges are everywhere, huh!
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:35:12 GMT, "wxforecaster"
<wxforecas…@kc.rr.com> wrote:
:Ya, I’m wondering if he realizes the jail time per count of libel when/if
:Belfort discovers this thread and then makes the easy trace of his now 14
:different identifies back to his PC.
No years. Libel isn’t a criminal matter in the US of A. It is in a
few other countries. But potentially a lot of money.
I’ve been thinking about this phantom. He’s not a regular Troll,
after all. There are a couple of reasons he’s doing this.
1) He’s a former employee who was fired for cause
2) He’s a competitor
3) He was a dealer or a suppler that they stopped doing business with
One thing he is certainly not – he’s not an unhappy customer, or he
would just tell his real story.
I think #1 is most likely, of course. Has anyone called Belfort and
asked? They might know already. Or they might be interested in
knowing what’s being said about them.
Mr. Salami up your a**:
You sir, are a big jerk! It is obvious you know nothing about freedom
of speech! anyone has a right to speak out, boycott, or post their
opinion for all to see! This includes gathering all available data,
and letting the public make their own minds up!
You know nothing of the laws and you are full of hot air! Take your
opinions, and shove them where the sun does not shine!
Your probably the PR guy for Belfort or something! Trying to keep your
job with them also!
Maybe individuals are just tired of companies doing and saying things
that they shouldn’t! You appear to be one of those salad tossing type
employees!
Anyway, go crawl up in a corner, and lick yourself!
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Bashir Salamati wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:35:12 GMT, "wxforecaster"
> <wxforecas…@kc.rr.com> wrote:
> :Ya, I’m wondering if he realizes the jail time per count of libel when/if
> :Belfort discovers this thread and then makes the easy trace of his now 14
> :different identifies back to his PC.
> No years. Libel isn’t a criminal matter in the US of A. It is in a
> few other countries. But potentially a lot of money.
> I’ve been thinking about this phantom. He’s not a regular Troll,
> after all. There are a couple of reasons he’s doing this.
> 1) He’s a former employee who was fired for cause
> 2) He’s a competitor
> 3) He was a dealer or a suppler that they stopped doing business with
> One thing he is certainly not – he’s not an unhappy customer, or he
> would just tell his real story.
> I think #1 is most likely, of course. Has anyone called Belfort and
> asked? They might know already. Or they might be interested in
> knowing what’s being said about them.
On 1 Jan 2006 21:57:02 -0800, belfortsu…@postmaster.co.uk wrote:
:Mr. Salami up your a**:
f speech! anyone has a right to speak out, boycott, or post their
pinion for all to see! This includes gathering all available data,
:
:You sir, are a big jerk! It is obvious you know nothing about freedom
:and letting the public make their own minds up!
Certainly it does. But when you post – or publish, or broadcast –
something that is not true, and financially harms someone else (or a
corporation) they have a cause of action against you. I note that in
this post you are using a UK return address. That is not a good idea.
It is MUCH, MUCH easier to prove libel in the UK than in the US.
Basically, the burden of proof is on you, not on them. I suggest you
read a primer on UK libel law here –
http://www.urban75.com/Action/libel.html
Since the Usenet is distributed in the UK, and Belfort does business
there (like most companies now days, they do business anywhere there’s
a customer with money) and you’re using a UK return address, you
pretty much fall under their jurisdiction. It would be dead simple
for Belfort to print out your posts and get a multi-million UK default
judgement against you. How widely was your post distributed? Was it
likely to result in financial harm to them? Did you intend for it to
harm them? Answer these, you’ll know how much the judgement will be.
How will they enforce it, you ask? It depends on where you actually
pinions, and shove them where the sun does not shine!
live, and how good your relationship with the local government is.
They can take that judgement to a local judge, and get him to issue an
order to the local sherrif to sieze your belongings. To do any of
that they’d have to know who you are – but I’m guessing they know that
already. I’ll bet you had some significant encounters with them in
person long before you started this little defamation campaign.
:
:You know nothing of the laws and you are full of hot air! Take your
A brilliant and cogent argument. Congratulations!
:
:Your probably the PR guy for Belfort or something! Trying to keep your
:job with them also!
Hardly. Before you had posted I had never heard of Belfort. Since
then I’ve had to buy some weather instrumentation, and (since they
were the only company I’d heard of) gave them a small order. They
delivered faster than scheduled, their equipment has worked perfectly
since then. They’ve been responsive and knowledgable on the phone,
and very pleasant to work with.
:
:Maybe individuals are just tired of companies doing and saying things
:that they shouldn’t! You appear to be one of those salad tossing type
:employees!
And you, in all your various incarnations, appear to be one very
disturbed person.
:
:Anyway, go crawl up in a corner, and lick yourself!
Another brilliant argument. You are certainly law school material,
Mr. Unknown Obsessive.
:
:Bashir Salamati wrote:
:> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:35:12 GMT, "wxforecaster"
:> <wxforecas…@kc.rr.com> wrote:
:>
:> :Ya, I’m wondering if he realizes the jail time per count of libel when/if
:> :Belfort discovers this thread and then makes the easy trace of his now 14
:> :different identifies back to his PC.
:>
:> No years. Libel isn’t a criminal matter in the US of A. It is in a
:> few other countries. But potentially a lot of money.
:>
:> I’ve been thinking about this phantom. He’s not a regular Troll,
:> after all. There are a couple of reasons he’s doing this.
:>
:> 1) He’s a former employee who was fired for cause
:> 2) He’s a competitor
:> 3) He was a dealer or a suppler that they stopped doing business with
:>
:> One thing he is certainly not – he’s not an unhappy customer, or he
:> would just tell his real story.
:>
:> I think #1 is most likely, of course. Has anyone called Belfort and
:> asked? They might know already. Or they might be interested in
:> knowing what’s being said about them.
Mr. Salami up your a**
Seems as though that salami is affecting your brain!
It is obvious that you know nothing about the law! YOU should stick
with the homo-community in which you belong!
Everything in this newsgroup about Belfort can be verified and is in
fact true! Thus, your argument is moot! It is also clear that you
know nothing about jurisdiction whatsoever! So take your homo views,
and share them with your boyfriend! He may giva a rats ass and give
you come of his!
The truth hurts individuals like you, because sooner or later, you’ll
have problems and remember that you were stupid …literally stupid!
I do NOT like Belfort for the way they treat their employees, and their
equipment has a lot to be desired! It is my opinion based on fact and
truth! Heck, maybe you can represent them, and see how far you get!
My viewpoint has just begun, and it shall continue as long as i desire!
So, go craw up your boyfriends A**!
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Bashir Salamati wrote:
> On 1 Jan 2006 21:57:02 -0800, belfortsu…@postmaster.co.uk wrote:
> :Mr. Salami up your a**:
f speech! anyone has a right to speak out, boycott, or post their 
pinion for all to see! This includes gathering all available data,
> :
> :You sir, are a big jerk! It is obvious you know nothing about freedom
>
>
> :and letting the public make their own minds up!
> Certainly it does. But when you post – or publish, or broadcast –
> something that is not true, and financially harms someone else (or a
> corporation) they have a cause of action against you. I note that in
> this post you are using a UK return address. That is not a good idea.
> It is MUCH, MUCH easier to prove libel in the UK than in the US.
> Basically, the burden of proof is on you, not on them. I suggest you
> read a primer on UK libel law here –
> http://www.urban75.com/Action/libel.html
> Since the Usenet is distributed in the UK, and Belfort does business
> there (like most companies now days, they do business anywhere there’s
> a customer with money) and you’re using a UK return address, you
> pretty much fall under their jurisdiction. It would be dead simple
> for Belfort to print out your posts and get a multi-million UK default
> judgement against you. How widely was your post distributed? Was it
> likely to result in financial harm to them? Did you intend for it to
> harm them? Answer these, you’ll know how much the judgement will be.
> How will they enforce it, you ask? It depends on where you actually
pinions, and shove them where the sun does not shine!
> live, and how good your relationship with the local government is.
> They can take that judgement to a local judge, and get him to issue an
> order to the local sherrif to sieze your belongings. To do any of
> that they’d have to know who you are – but I’m guessing they know that
> already. I’ll bet you had some significant encounters with them in
> person long before you started this little defamation campaign.
> :
> :You know nothing of the laws and you are full of hot air! Take your
>
> A brilliant and cogent argument. Congratulations!
> :
> :Your probably the PR guy for Belfort or something! Trying to keep your
> :job with them also!
> Hardly. Before you had posted I had never heard of Belfort. Since
> then I’ve had to buy some weather instrumentation, and (since they
> were the only company I’d heard of) gave them a small order. They
> delivered faster than scheduled, their equipment has worked perfectly
> since then. They’ve been responsive and knowledgable on the phone,
> and very pleasant to work with.
> :
> :Maybe individuals are just tired of companies doing and saying things
> :that they shouldn’t! You appear to be one of those salad tossing type
> :employees!
> And you, in all your various incarnations, appear to be one very
> disturbed person.
> :
> :Anyway, go crawl up in a corner, and lick yourself!
> Another brilliant argument. You are certainly law school material,
> Mr. Unknown Obsessive.
> :
> :Bashir Salamati wrote:
> :> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:35:12 GMT, "wxforecaster"
> :> <wxforecas…@kc.rr.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> :Ya, I’m wondering if he realizes the jail time per count of libel when/if
> :> :Belfort discovers this thread and then makes the easy trace of his now 14
> :> :different identifies back to his PC.
> :>
> :> No years. Libel isn’t a criminal matter in the US of A. It is in a
> :> few other countries. But potentially a lot of money.
> :>
> :> I’ve been thinking about this phantom. He’s not a regular Troll,
> :> after all. There are a couple of reasons he’s doing this.
> :>
> :> 1) He’s a former employee who was fired for cause
> :> 2) He’s a competitor
> :> 3) He was a dealer or a suppler that they stopped doing business with
> :>
> :> One thing he is certainly not – he’s not an unhappy customer, or he
> :> would just tell his real story.
> :>
> :> I think #1 is most likely, of course. Has anyone called Belfort and
> :> asked? They might know already. Or they might be interested in
> :> knowing what’s being said about them.
On 2 Jan 2006 11:43:58 -0800, belfortsu…@postmaster.co.uk wrote:
:Mr. Salami up your a**
:
:Seems as though that salami is affecting your brain!
:
:It is obvious that you know nothing about the law! YOU should stick
:with the homo-community in which you belong!
How very odd. We were talking about weather instrumentation,
international libel law and corporate governance. Somehow you’ve made
the leap to the topic of homosexuality. How is it that this is the
first topic you associate with the law? Have you had your own
unfortunate run-ins with the law and homosexuality?
:
:Everything in this newsgroup about Belfort can be verified and is in
:fact true!
No one has been able to figure out what your arguments are, much less
been able to verify them.
:Thus, your argument is moot!
Actually, no. While the truth is an absolute defense in a US libel
case, that is not so in the UK.
:It is also clear that you
:know nothing about jurisdiction whatsoever!
Again, no. The EU constitution is a marvelous thing. It breaks down
all the old ideas about jurisdiction. Belfort could – if it chose –
sue you for libel in any one of the EU countries. Now, they’d have to
have the cooperation of local authorities to enforce a judgement, but
I’m betting that the local constabulary doesn’t feel very sympathetic
to you, where ever you really are.
:So take your homo views,
:and share them with your boyfriend! He may giva a rats ass and give
:you come of his!
Again, why are you so obsessed with homosexuals? Was your gym teacher
a little friendlier than he should have been? Were you trying to
learn a bicycle and answer an ad titled "Bi-curious"?
:
:The truth hurts individuals like you, because sooner or later, you’ll
:have problems and remember that you were stupid …literally stupid!
A brilliant argument. I do not see how I can possibly answer this,
given your extraordinary insight and clarity of mind.
:
:I do NOT like Belfort for the way they treat their employees
Which reminds me – how do YOU know how Belfort treats their employees?
Their employees aren’t picketing, or taking out ads protesting how
they are treated. They aren’t sending out press releases. If, in
fact, they are treated badly, how has it come to your attention?
:, and their
:equipment has a lot to be desired!
In my admittedly limited experience, their equipment has performed
without flaw or fail.
:It is my opinion based on fact and
:truth! Heck, maybe you can represent them, and see how far you get!
:
:My viewpoint has just begun, and it shall continue as long as i desire!
English is not your first language, is it? It’s not mine either – I
didn’t learn any more than the basics until I moved to the west. I
recommend that you spend time with native speakers. "My viewpoint has
just begun" is a very strange construction in english, like "all your
base are belong to us." A "viewpoint" is a single thing, not a
process. Think of a streetsign, rather than a journey. You have a
viewpoint or you don’t. You might develop one, you can certainly
expound on one. You don’t begin one. On the other hand, your
argument, or your diatribe, or your incoherent delusional rant may
have just begun.
: So, go craw up your boyfriends A**!
Mysterious Phantom, this obsession you have with my boyfriend’s a** is
very unhealthy. You should seek professional help – either from a
qualified psychological councilor, or perhaps an experienced female
prostitute who can introduce you to heterosexual intercourse. It
really is a marvelous thing, and you might find that you enjoy it once
you’ve tried it.
Classic!
All your AWOS are belong to us!
MR. BUSHY SALAMI:
You appear to be a real jerk! Who in the hell made you the internet
policeman! You obviously cannot read, nor understand that people have
the right to their opinions and slam whom they so desire! It’s called
freedom of speech! if they outright make up untruths, maybe you have
something. But, there are many criterias which must be met!
You need to go back to afghanistan and play with your dictator friends
in the Taliban! in fact, you are harassing this individual and making
threats towards him, with your posts!
Ideally, he should come after you, and sue you and have the sherriffs
empty your home and bank accounts!
You also need to do some reasearch into Supreme Court decisions and the
right to present open debate on issues!
Anyway, GET A NEW NAME, and go back to your third world scarf wearing
unshaven populace and interact with your unbathed stinking salad
tossing misfits!
Your nothing but an ape-like sphincter!
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Bashir Salamati wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2006 11:43:58 -0800, belfortsu…@postmaster.co.uk wrote:
> :Mr. Salami up your a**
> :
> :Seems as though that salami is affecting your brain!
> :
> :It is obvious that you know nothing about the law! YOU should stick
> :with the homo-community in which you belong!
> How very odd. We were talking about weather instrumentation,
> international libel law and corporate governance. Somehow you’ve made
> the leap to the topic of homosexuality. How is it that this is the
> first topic you associate with the law? Have you had your own
> unfortunate run-ins with the law and homosexuality?
> :
> :Everything in this newsgroup about Belfort can be verified and is in
> :fact true!
> No one has been able to figure out what your arguments are, much less
> been able to verify them.
> :Thus, your argument is moot!
> Actually, no. While the truth is an absolute defense in a US libel
> case, that is not so in the UK.
> :It is also clear that you
> :know nothing about jurisdiction whatsoever!
> Again, no. The EU constitution is a marvelous thing. It breaks down
> all the old ideas about jurisdiction. Belfort could – if it chose –
> sue you for libel in any one of the EU countries. Now, they’d have to
> have the cooperation of local authorities to enforce a judgement, but
> I’m betting that the local constabulary doesn’t feel very sympathetic
> to you, where ever you really are.
> :So take your homo views,
> :and share them with your boyfriend! He may giva a rats ass and give
> :you come of his!
> Again, why are you so obsessed with homosexuals? Was your gym teacher
> a little friendlier than he should have been? Were you trying to
> learn a bicycle and answer an ad titled "Bi-curious"?
> :
> :The truth hurts individuals like you, because sooner or later, you’ll
> :have problems and remember that you were stupid …literally stupid!
> A brilliant argument. I do not see how I can possibly answer this,
> given your extraordinary insight and clarity of mind.
> :
> :I do NOT like Belfort for the way they treat their employees
> Which reminds me – how do YOU know how Belfort treats their employees?
> Their employees aren’t picketing, or taking out ads protesting how
> they are treated. They aren’t sending out press releases. If, in
> fact, they are treated badly, how has it come to your attention?
> :, and their
> :equipment has a lot to be desired!
> In my admittedly limited experience, their equipment has performed
> without flaw or fail.
> :It is my opinion based on fact and
> :truth! Heck, maybe you can represent them, and see how far you get!
> :
> :My viewpoint has just begun, and it shall continue as long as i desire!
> English is not your first language, is it? It’s not mine either – I
> didn’t learn any more than the basics until I moved to the west. I
> recommend that you spend time with native speakers. "My viewpoint has
> just begun" is a very strange construction in english, like "all your
> base are belong to us." A "viewpoint" is a single thing, not a
> process. Think of a streetsign, rather than a journey. You have a
> viewpoint or you don’t. You might develop one, you can certainly
> expound on one. You don’t begin one. On the other hand, your
> argument, or your diatribe, or your incoherent delusional rant may
> have just begun.
> : So, go craw up your boyfriends A**!
> Mysterious Phantom, this obsession you have with my boyfriend’s a** is
> very unhealthy. You should seek professional help – either from a
> qualified psychological councilor, or perhaps an experienced female
> prostitute who can introduce you to heterosexual intercourse. It
> really is a marvelous thing, and you might find that you enjoy it once
> you’ve tried it.
On 2 Jan 2006 21:19:25 -0800, andrepast…@okfrance.com wrote:
:MR. BUSHY SALAMI:
:
:You appear to be a real jerk!
Why thank you! You’re clearly an expert on the third derivative of
position.
:Who in the hell made you the internet
:policeman! You obviously cannot read,
Really, it’s just that you cannot write. At least in English.
: nor understand that people have
:the right to their opinions and slam whom they so desire! It’s called
:freedom of speech!
It’s called libel, Effendi. And your anonymous proxy servers in
Russia, Colombia and Korea won’t stop a judgement if Belfort gets
serious about you.
That’s the difficulty, isn’t it. As long as you post in a bizarre,
half literate circle-jerk of sock puppets Belfort won’t see you as a
threat worth dealing with. But that won’t do them any harm, either.
If you ever come up with something that will really hurt them, they’ll
write a large check to their lawyers and drop a truck on your head,
figuratively speaking of course.
:if they outright make up untruths, maybe you have
:something. But, there are many criterias which must be met!
Again, you use this odd construction. Are you writing in another
language and using a translating program?
:
:You need to go back to afghanistan and play with your dictator friends
:in the Taliban!
Ah, the Taliban!! They were so much fun to hunt. They made a nice
squealing sound when you shot them. How I miss them. I almost wish
they would come back to power so I could go kill more of them. Once
we took one and gave him to some of the local women he’d tortured.
Kipling was right – never let them give you to the Afghan women.
:in fact, you are harassing this individual and making
:threats towards him, with your posts!
Advising someone that they are putting themselves at risk is a threat?
Ah, I see. In your world you let the children run out into the
street. Of course, how could I have been so blind!!
:
:Ideally, he should come after you, and sue you and have the sherriffs
:empty your home and bank accounts!
Indeed? Because I have pointed out his exposure to a legal action by
Belfort? Might I ask what claim he might have? How has he – that is,
you – been damaged?
Let me think on this. For you to have been damaged by my posting that
you’re libeling Belfort, my posts would have to have deprived you of
income. That would mean that you’re making money from your posts.
And that means that our mysterious poster is one of Belfort’s
competitors! Of course, it is clear to me now.
:
:You also need to do some reasearch into Supreme Court decisions and the
:right to present open debate on issues!
:
:Anyway, GET A NEW NAME, and go back to your third world scarf wearing
:unshaven populace and interact with your unbathed stinking salad
:tossing misfits!
We are all aware that you GET A NEW NAME once a day. What we can’t
understand is why you bother. When you post it’s obvious, from the
broken syntax and, of course, the topic. You never stray from your
single issue – any when no one agrees with your assertions you create
a new name and restate them in ever more fractured language. We all
know it’s just you. In fact, most people don’t even notice that
you’re using more than one name.
:
:Your nothing but an ape-like sphincter!
Once again your brilliant jape leaves me humbled.