<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another PP-ASEL privileges question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foraviators.info/yet-another-pp-asel-privileges-question/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foraviators.info/yet-another-pp-asel-privileges-question</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.foraviators.info/yet-another-pp-asel-privileges-question/comment-page-1#comment-8868</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foraviators.info/yet-another-pp-asel-privileges-question#comment-8868</guid>
		<description>
  &quot;Yossarian&quot; &lt;yossarian...@yahoo.com&gt; wrote in message &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;news:1127322378.933388.316020@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... &lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&gt; Pilot A: &#160;owns a plane and does aerial photography for a business, but &lt;br /&gt; &gt; does not have a current medical or BFR. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; Pilot B (me): &#160;current private pilot w/medical. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&gt; Can I legally fly Pilot A&#039;s plane on an aerial photography flight (with &lt;br /&gt; &gt; him in the right seat) if I pay half the expenses, which in this case &lt;br /&gt; &gt; would just be gas? &#160;Sounds like it would require a commercial &lt;br /&gt; &gt; certificate to me but I thought I&#039;d throw it out there. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;IMHO, the way I see it is that you&#039;re renting and flying a plane with a &lt;br /&gt; passenger. If he doesn&#039;t have a current medical and BFR, he&#039;s not a &lt;br /&gt; (current) pilot. This would then fall under the common purpose. If you have &lt;br /&gt; a reason to fly somewhere, you can invite this &#039;passenger&#039; along to snap &lt;br /&gt; pictures and would be able to share the costs. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My question is why Pilot A has a plane and an aerial photography business &lt;br /&gt; and not be current??? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As always, check the FAR&#039;s, your local FSDO, the insurance policy, etc.,,,,, &lt;br /&gt; and other&#039;s opinions. It depends on how you state the situation. &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Yossarian&quot; &lt;yossarian&#8230;@yahoo.com&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:1127322378.933388.316020@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com&#8230; <br /> 
<p>&gt; Pilot A: &nbsp;owns a plane and does aerial photography for a business, but <br /> &gt; does not have a current medical or BFR.  </p>
<p>&gt; Pilot B (me): &nbsp;current private pilot w/medical.  </p>
<p>&gt; Can I legally fly Pilot A&#8217;s plane on an aerial photography flight (with <br /> &gt; him in the right seat) if I pay half the expenses, which in this case <br /> &gt; would just be gas? &nbsp;Sounds like it would require a commercial <br /> &gt; certificate to me but I thought I&#8217;d throw it out there. </p>
<p>IMHO, the way I see it is that you&#8217;re renting and flying a plane with a <br /> passenger. If he doesn&#8217;t have a current medical and BFR, he&#8217;s not a <br /> (current) pilot. This would then fall under the common purpose. If you have <br /> a reason to fly somewhere, you can invite this &#8216;passenger&#8217; along to snap <br /> pictures and would be able to share the costs.  </p>
<p>My question is why Pilot A has a plane and an aerial photography business <br /> and not be current???  </p>
<p>As always, check the FAR&#8217;s, your local FSDO, the insurance policy, etc.,,,,, <br /> and other&#8217;s opinions. It depends on how you state the situation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

